|
Writing tips
The plot
thickens
Choosing
a literary
agent
Query letters
Inspire me!
But they
rejected me!
|


Submissions tips
1. Make sure you spell check whatever you
send. Every error will put a black mark on your card, and if you get
more than a handful of those, you'll be handed a red card. Above all
else, check the spelling of the agent's name.
2. If there's doubt about the sex of the
agent, do some careful research. I know of one or two agents, and
publishers, whose sex isn't obvious from their names
(I can't think of any reason why they don't make it clear.
But that's how it is).
3. Email queries were once a non-starter. But
today, agents are more obliging.
If you are emailing, I suggest you send a simple, clear,
polite email with a brief synopsis introducing your project. But
don't send an attachment until it's been specifically
requested. It can't hurt, however, to add a sample of your writing
in the body of the email. Not more than a chapter, and preferably
less. It might be your only chance to impress, so seize that
chance.
4. Don't submit to more than one agent at a
given agency. It undermines your project by building in mistrust,
and will almost certainly get you a rejection if spotted.
5. Think carefully before revising a
manuscript on a literary agent's suggestion unless there's a clear
intent by that agent to represent you (albeit a conditional one).
You can spend a lot of time rewriting to suit individual whims and
never really advance your project. By all means listen to advice and
suggestions, but follow your own instincts.
6. If you've had a manuscript rejected, in
theory you can't resubmit it. But if it's been substantially
revised, you can ask an agent to take a second look. Some writers,
note, routinely re-send their rejected and re-titled manuscripts on
the principle that agents have short memories, or that a different
agent at the same agency may discover it. Beyond that, you may have
written an horrendous query letter, or committed some other faux pas
and need, or just want, a second chance. Or you may have since
realised that you should have started at chapter four or something
similar. Or you may have found a new way to 'spin' a previously
submitted story giving it fresh impetus. Agents, perhaps through no
fault of their own, commonly misunderstand projects. That “second
chance” submission may help address this. But make it a genuinely
significant improvement or revision.
7. Don't staple your manuscript pages. Don't
clip them in a folder. Don't hole-punch them. Don't dress them in
any way. Just send them loose in a small, easily opened, easily
closed box with the title on each page and page numbers (folios).
Leave some margin around the copy. Make it as presentable as
possible. Use a straightforward typeface (font) such as Times,
Garamond, or a similar serif face (if you're not sure what a serif
is, you know what to do). Avoid fonts such as Courier or Helvetica
or anything fancy. Be plain. Be straightforward.
8. Should you double space? In the old days
this was vital. I'd argue that it's less so now. Double spacing was
intended to give editors and proofreaders room to make corrections
and notes. With modern word processors, this is less important. That
said, don't make the copy too tight. It can make your manuscript
look like too much of a chore to read. So ease up (see
Samples
for examples of how a manuscript might look).
9. Always include return postage if you want
your manuscript back - but it may be better to reprint each time you
send it out. It's bad for the environment, etc. But a creased and
crumpled manuscript landing on an agent’s desk won't do you any
favours. In view of the high cost of postage, it may, in any case,
also save money in the long term.
10. If you're dealing with an overseas agent,
ask if you can forward the manuscript by email. Or offer to pay for
running off a copy on their printer if you want. Just make sure it doesn't sound like a bribe.
11. Spell check rigourously.
12. Grammar check with equal rigour.
13. Be patient. You can follow up your
submission with a polite email or telephone. But give it 12 weeks at
least.
Back to the top
Home
|
|
Choosing a literary agent
Actually,
unless a writer is well established, he or she rarely chooses a
literary agent. What usually happens is that a literary agent agrees
to represent a manuscript - an opportunity that the writer, having
been rejected X number of times, generally jumps at.
But at some point in the manuscript submission process a
selection of agents needs to be made.
Not all agents will handle whatever it is you're
submitting, which means that you're best advised to make a very
careful selection, usually through the Writers' & Artists' Yearbook
or through the internet or other trade reference books.
You can usually get the Writers' & Artists' Yearbook at
your public library, but it's often in hot demand and/or out of date
by a year or so. Even when it is in date it's often out of date. The
reason for this is that much of the publishing trade appears to live
in a revolving door. Agents form partnerships that seem to vanish
overnight. Sometimes agents radically cut or change their lists.
Publishers merge, or (occasionally) divide. The entire industry is
in a permanent state of flux.
To maintain any kind of grip on it, you need to actively
trawl the net and/or read the literary columns of the newspapers,
and/or attend book trade fairs.
Look at who's representing who and what and then research your
literary agent as best you can. Find out something about
them, however trivial. It can make a lot of difference to your
Query Letter
approach if you demonstrate that you're targeting an agent intelligently
and have taken the trouble to find out their likes and dislikes.
Next, remember that agents choose books for a variety of
reasons and, like the publishing world in general, they
follow trends rather than set them.
Mr or Ms Literary Agent?
You might want
to keep in mind that most literary agents are women. Some say this
has ruined the market (for men at least). Others feel that female
literary agents have simply expanded the market and have introduced
ideas and genres that didn't exist 10 years or so ago.
Either way, whether you're a male or female writer,
you'll want to know as much as possible about who is likely to want
to represent you, and why.
I'd suggest that you be very methodical about who you
approach. Keep a list of some sort. Keep a note of any telephone
calls you make - along with brief details. Cross-reference agents
with other agencies they've moved from, or to. And keep an up to
date record, where possible, of their clients.
Don't assume that only male literary agents want
thrillers whilst female literary agents want chicklit. It doesn't
work like that. And even
though there probably are certain divisions and demarcations, you're best advised to
treat all agents as equal, even though clearly that isn't the case,
not in terms of professionalism or energy or connections.
And don't assume that just because an agency represents
a writer with a similar style to your own, they'll want you
on board too. It may well be that they want something different now.
Sometimes you can use this to your advantage if you find evidence of
agencies in competition, or agencies that have recently split. Think
about it.
Agent X
Watch out for
dodgy agents. In the UK, I think we have a slightly better record
regarding this problem than in, say, the US. That's not to say
Americans are, by nature, more crooked. It may simply be that in the
UK we have a smaller "nest" that makes it hard for dodgy agents to
survive. The US has tens of thousands of agents spread across a huge
area - which, come to think of it, might simply mean that although the number of dodgy
agents is higher, it's not necessarily higher per capita.
On the subject of US agents, there's no reason not to
approach them with your manuscript. But the odds against hooking one
are probably much lower than making a deal with a British agent. But
a US
writer, conversely, may find it easier to hook an agent on the
British side of the Atlantic. America, after all, is a huge country,
much of it still fairly empty, and that gives a large arena to play
out a
high concept (blockbuster) novel - which are always in demand.
Meanwhile, a British writer looking for a high concept
theme has to generally travel a long way from his or her own back yard to
find a suitable stage to play out his or her drama. Yes, you can set
your drama anywhere you want. But US agents will sell primarily into
their home market, so you might have to make your US-based character
an American (which you may not have the ear for), or you may have to
find a plausible reason for your British hero operating out of the
USA.
I've had some very good feedback from US agents. They
tend to be a little more outspoken (quelle surprise!) and are
invariably constructive and helpful. But you've got to have a
compelling idea to make an
US
agent want to take you on.
Fees
Never pay a
literary agent to read your manuscript - unless, of course, you find
strong reasons to do so (and I've never heard anything that
would compel me to put my hand in my pocket and pay for that
service).
Watch too for agents who recommend editors or other
professionals. It may be a genuine and well intentioned
recommendation. But it may be that the link between the agent and
the editor is questionable. Just be smart, and always ask the exact
nature of the connection. Use the net to check, but don't rely on
the net.
Always be professional when writing to an agent, and
approach them the way they want to be approached (see
Query Letters
for more on this). And always listen carefully to what they have to
say. You don't have to heed the advice, but you ought to take
whatever opportunities are available to learn more about the
mechanisms of the industry and the people within it.
Don't bribe agents or try and cut some other cute deal.
Just present your product in a businesslike way and give them plenty
of time to make a decision (3 months is plenty).
If an agent asks to meet you, then meet them if it feels
right. But beware. I had a time-wasting and very demoralising
experience with an agent who, despite putting on a big front and
promising good connections, totally failed to deliver. Tempting as
it is to name that agent, all I can (or rather will) say is
that the agent has, to a greater or lesser extent, had his or her
card marked and is, in any case, currently maintaining a very low profile.
Never give an agent the only copy of your manuscript.
And never make a single back-up. Rather, make as many back-ups as you can
reasonably manage. All my own novels are on multiple hard drives,
numerous CDs, various flash drives, and in hard (paper) copy too.
As an additional back-up, I generally hold whatever I'm
working on in cyberspace by emailing the working copy to another
email address (just remember to update it regularly).
Unfinished books
Yes, you can
approach agents with an unfinished manuscript. This is the usual
method with, say, a new cookbook book proposal or a new Ferrari
history tome. But you can approach an agent with an unfinished
fiction project too - but once again, it needs to be compelling
before an agent takes you seriously. And you're well advised to
mention whatever writing credentials or experience you have if you
want to convince an agent that you can finish the manuscript. It
depends largely on how good your idea is, how good your
Query Letter
is, plus the other usual vagaries of the market.
The third degree
If an agent has a website,
check it out. Who else does he or she represent? And
what books has that agent taken to market? And how long ago was that
exactly? Then, look at the websites of the authors represented by
that agency (if available). See what's being said, if anything is
being said at all.
Some authors
feel their agents are a necessary evil. Others feel that their
agents are a Godsend. Mostly, agents are just jobbing professionals
balancing a range of problems and shuffling between a range of
clients with varying needs.
And agents, in
the main, don't have a magic wand with which to sell your book. They
set up meetings with editors at publishing houses and face rejection
just as you do. They campaign the books they represent, often with
their reputations at stake - especially if the recent books they've
championed have failed in the bookstores.
They have
budgets and costs and highs and lows - due occasionally to authors
who fail to come up with the literary goods.
But don't let
any of this get between yourself and your need for some direct
information from the agent. You need to know about their successes
and exactly what they can do for you. Be polite, but not too
pushy. It's an agent's market. But if they can't give you some
straight answers to questions fairly put, they might not be quite as
professional as they would like to appear.
The origin of the species
Where do
literary agents come from? Well, most appear to come directly from
within the publishing industry; either disgruntled, dissatisfied,
ambitious or redundant editors. Some are office juniors looking for
a quick way up. Or office seniors marginalised in corporate cubby
holes.
But some just appear, as if from nowhere. More than a
few are simply business people hoping to strike it rich in an
industry that can have amazing highs, and amazing lows. Some have a
legal background. And some are just failed writers.
So don't assume that the agent you approach necessarily
has an incredible literary antenna and knows what's good and what's
bad - or, more to the point, what sells. Literary agents merely know what they
want -
and often not even that. Many agents are under a lot of pressure to
succeed and may be forced to reject books that they personally like,
but feel would fail in a highly competitive marketplace (see
But
they rejected me!).
In conclusion, be professional at all times, be polite,
be fair, be accurate and be prepared.
And be confident too. Have faith in your own work - but
without being cocky or conceited.
It may take years to build up
a working rapport with a number of agents (who occasionally have the bad
grace to move suddenly from the industry, retire or even die). Just keep trying.
Why do literary agents fail to
respond to my emails?
Because they're
rude, mostly. It's as simple as that. Many agents will tell you that
they're simply too overwhelmed with submissions to respond. But
that's no excuse. None at all. It takes a matter of seconds to send
a standard rejection. However, increasingly agents (and editors)
just don't bother to do even that. You send your query (that's cost
you four pints of blood) and there you are, dangling in cyberspace
and unsure of how long to wait before trying elsewhere.
"If I
haven't responded in 2 weeks/4 weeks/25 years, it means that your
project isn't suitable for my lists, etc". Does that sound
familiar? The trouble with this response is that no reply doesn't
confirm delivery. Your email might have inadvertently ended up in
their spam folder. Or a glitch in your email might have dumped it in
the wrong mailbox (it happens). Or they might simply have missed it
in the litter of email activity they routinely have to trawl.
What we, as
writers, really want is for all agents to say, "If you haven't
got a response from me in 2 weeks/4 weeks/6 weeks, then I've
probably missed your email, so please re-send." But that's not
going to happen, so get over it.
The internet
plays a part here. It's a lot easier to fire off an email (complete
with attachment) than type a letter, print it, address an envelope,
etc, and walk it down to the post box. It takes me days to do that
sometimes (weeks even if you want the truth). But, like most people,
I can fire off emails at machine gun speed - and that, in effect,
has devalued the currency of language.
Words have
never been cheaper, and there's not a lot you can do about it except
endure.
The only sure
fire way to get a literary agent to sit up and take notice is to
write a devilishly good book, pen a devilishly good synopsis,
construct a devilishly good query letter, and then get lucky. Just
how lucky you get is directly proportionate to the amount of
effort you put in, day after day after day.
There's no way
of proving what I'm about to say, but my guess is that you'll still
generally get a more positive result by sending your query by snail
mail. That can get expensive, especially if you're sending sample
chapters too, but my suspicion is that people still value paper mail
above email (notwithstanding the environmental impact).
I've got a literary agent, but
nothing's happening?
That happens.
Literary agents, like every other professional, aren't always good.
Some are worse than useless. Some are highly damaging. And you can
be damned (to a greater or lesser degree) simply by being
associated with them. Even worse, you can be seriously
demoralised when you've suffered a year of promises only to find
that you're in exactly the same place and that your book is going
nowhere.
Literary agents
can never guarantee to sell your book. But a good literary
agent, with the right contacts, can usually put your manuscript in
front of the right people at the right time and will present your
book in a clear and positive light. A lousy literary agents will
handle your novel the way a market trader handles a cheap TV.
It's a tough
call, but my general feeling is that if your instincts are
telling you that your agent is dragging you down, professionally or
psychologically, then cut them loose and do whatever you can to
refloat your spirit and keep it buoyant.
Books, and
novels in particular, are fuelled by huge amounts of creative
energy. So go easy on the gas, and don't let anyone siphon it away
while you're not looking.
Good luck.
|
|